It may well be the case that fighting climate change will require middle-class and even working-class people in wealthy countries to change their lifestyles in the decades ahead. Given, however, the extent to which the rich are disproportionately responsible for global emissions, and the widespread public consensus around raising their taxes, it would be both politically popular and sound policy-wise to emphasize redistributive solutions to the climate crisis.

    • @southerntofu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Sorry to be pedantic but this is so wrong on so many levels. Overpopulation can be considered an issue but is definitely not the issue. The issues are:

      • overproduction
      • gatekeeping access to resources and wilful waste (food waste, empty housing, planned obsolescence)
      • barbaric techniques for production: extractivism as a doctrine, miniaturization as a goal, monocultures with fertilizers for food

      If we just stopped this crazy nonsense called “industrial capitalism” the many billions of us all would live happily, and we wouldn’t have 1M+ endangered species.

    • मुक्त
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Interesting side note. Compare the emissions for “poor” Americans and “rich” Indians.

      Almost like rich Indians are poorer than poor Americans.

      • @ttmrichter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        I’ve been doing that comparison for ages now. The bottom 50% of Americans are more wasteful than the top 10% of five nations. The American average is more wasteful than the top 10% of ten nations. The USA is almost repulsive in how much it emits … doubly so because Americans tend, too, to be the preachiest about emissions to other nations.